zach galifianakis gq magazine

zach galifianakis gq magazine. Anyways we love Zach here at
  • Anyways we love Zach here at



  • dXTC
    Jan 1, 10:02 PM
    Why concede? I think we are examining obesity pretty well as a group. Furthermore, the current level of obesity is really everyone's problem, as the level affects our society as a whole.

    This lady in question though blows my mind as the article has framed it to appear that her goal is to gain weight. Perhaps the article misinterpreted what she meant.

    I would agree that we have steered this conversation away from the "eeeewww she's a horrid, disgusting pig" comments to more abstract concepts. Kudos.

    The article, like most articles about this particular woman, was quite sensationalized. Then again, the reporter didn't misinterpret by much, because this woman played along with it for a while (and has been in a feeder/feedee relationship for some time). Afterward, in an attempt at "damage control", she said that the thousand-pound thing was more of a fantasy than an attainable goal, but by then, the exaggerated perceptions about her had spread too far.

    She hasn't been in the news in the past couple of months, however, so maybe she and her family can regain some level of normalcy.

    There is another thing KnightWRX is right about in his last post: A good percentage of supersize people eat for reasons other than the love of food. They often get the signal that they're full, but ignore it. Food addiction does exist, and can be as difficult to manage as alcoholism or drug addiction.





    zach galifianakis gq magazine. GQ Magzine August 2010 Zach
  • GQ Magzine August 2010 Zach



  • astroot
    Apr 28, 05:57 PM
    I sat the two next to each other just like the original pic there, and they are exactly the same, in my opinion. Imagine the OP got a "defective" one.





    zach galifianakis gq magazine. zach galifianakis
  • zach galifianakis



  • okwhatev
    Apr 14, 11:48 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)

    iBooks appears broken with the 4.3.2 redsnow jailbreak. Anyone else see this? Everything else runs fine, and like everyone else has commented, it seems snappier.





    zach galifianakis gq magazine. Shop the magazine.
  • Shop the magazine.



  • Macinthetosh
    Apr 22, 04:18 PM
    I have never been a fan of the teardrop form factor.



    more...


    zach galifianakis gq magazine. Terry Richardson shot Zach
  • Terry Richardson shot Zach



  • SciFrog
    Oct 26, 08:21 PM
    The 80k PPD is a 32 core AMD system...





    zach galifianakis gq magazine. The GQ iPhone app: Look sharp.
  • The GQ iPhone app: Look sharp.



  • lordonuthin
    Nov 30, 09:40 PM
    thanks! yeah the bigadv units are nice, but i'm starting to think the gpus is where it's at. i'm already thinking of putting another gpu in my i7 machine (the one i've been running bigadv units on).

    which 2 gpus are you thinking about adding?

    yeah that 12 core mac pro will be tempting, but i bet the price won't be though

    It's amazing how much the the price has increased for "pro" macs over the years, though if you look at comparable dell's or hp's they are often more expensive than a high end mac pro (without the add on's, Apple want's too much for memory and hdd's).

    I was thinking of maybe 2 more gtx 275's, that would make 4 275's and 2 260's. 3 would go on the i7 machine and 3 on the amd 965 and since I didn't have much luck with windows 7 running normal units well on the amd I may not get the normal cpu units running on the i7 either, all of those gpu's will make up for any difference though. That will probably be it for new horse power for a while, I may have to live with the idea that I will never catch up to mc68k :rolleyes: or even atlasfolding :D



    more...


    zach galifianakis gq magazine. with Zach Galifianakis.
  • with Zach Galifianakis.



  • Kardashian
    Jul 25, 08:56 AM
    ITS RELEASED!

    ...Just not in the UK yet! Give it a few mins...

    But judging by the US price its gonna be a good �50+ :eek:





    zach galifianakis gq magazine. Zach Galifianakis For GQ~
  • Zach Galifianakis For GQ~



  • randyoo
    Apr 14, 08:35 PM
    Are people firing up their lawyers because Apple does not update their iPhone 3G that came with iOS 3 when they bought it in june 2010 ? Doesn't the licence flyer in the box say Apple will supply the current iOS version +1 ?

    Disclaimer: I don't use an iPhone 3G, but I have plenty of friends who do.

    It's a shame that Apple isn't at least back-porting security fixes for 3G users. No new features, just security fixes. (although that new version of WebKit would probably give them a nice speed-boost, too!)

    There are still plenty of iPhone 3G users under warranty. Maybe if they start getting hacked (by simply navigating to a "wrong" website), and Apple has to replace their phones, something might change... Meh, who am I kidding? They would still simply weigh the number of phones they'd need to replace against the number of sales they might lose by providing updates, and go with whatever makes them the most money, just like Ford execs figured it would be cheaper to pay out victims of the Pinto's tendency to go up in flames from minor accidents, rather than pay for a redesign.

    I hated to see support dropped for iPhone 3G, because that means my (and my wife's) 3GS is next on the chopping block. Now, it's just a matter of waiting for the axe to drop...



    more...


    zach galifianakis gq magazine. Zach Galifianakis. Actor.
  • Zach Galifianakis. Actor.



  • twoodcc
    Oct 13, 01:29 PM
    well we just got passed again. we are now ranked #59 as a team. and there are plenty more teams on our heels





    zach galifianakis gq magazine. zach galifianakis and news
  • zach galifianakis and news



  • jhu
    Oct 24, 07:36 AM
    Since I don't have a "Family Pack": Could you have a look at the license and check whether it would allow installing on three Macs plus in a virtual machine on two of these Macs for a total of five copies?

    here's the 5-pack eula (http://www.apple.com/legal/sla/macosxfamily.html):

    ADDENDUM to Software License Agreement for Mac OS X

    The first and second sentences of Section 2A of the Software License Agreement for Mac OS X are revised as follows:

    A. This License allows you to install and use one copy of the Apple Software on up to a maximum of five (5) Apple-labeled computers at a time as long as those computers are located in the same household and used by persons who occupy that same household. By "household" we mean a person or persons who share the same housing unit such as a home, apartment, mobile home or condominium, but shall also extend to student members who are primary residents of that household but residing at a separate on-campus location. This license does not extend to business or commercial users.

    The remainder of this Section 2 and all other terms and conditions of this Agreement remain in full force and effect.

    1 license for 1 copy of the software on one computer.



    more...


    zach galifianakis gq magazine. Zach Galifianakis strips for
  • Zach Galifianakis strips for



  • Keleko
    Apr 5, 09:30 PM
    Great colours on this one. Do you think it would look even better cropped slightly?


    This is already cropped some. I just tried cropping a bit off the top, and I think you're right. It looks a bit better that way.


    I'm usually not a big fan of bird shots involving human accessories, such as the table and chairs, but this one is just stunning. You exposed the bird perfectly as there are tons of details in the feathers, and the color separation from the background makes the bird standout.


    I'm glad you liked it. I have to credit the cardinal for posing where he did and for being red against the mostly green background, though. :)

    Today's shot is a place I bet many of you didn't know existed. It is a "tourist/post card" picture, but I wanted to use it anyway just to see how many recognize it.

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5222/5594130162_e210b78de6_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/22077805@N07/5594130162/)





    zach galifianakis gq magazine. Speaking to British GQ
  • Speaking to British GQ



  • MikeTheC
    Jul 22, 11:02 PM
    My 2�...

    I 100% agree with the sentiment that Apple should not try to have a meteoric growth rate. From what I've seen over the years, a company can grow to any size it wants and be stable, but if it does it too fast (or, frankly, if it does it for the wrong reasons) it becomes unwieldly and unstable, and eventually will die. I know people here will laugh when I say this, but I fully expect to see this phenominon happen to both Wal-Mart and Home Depot, just like it's happened to countless other companies who got too big too quickly.

    I firmly believe that marketshare is significant in that it is a make or break for software and peripheral development. It is also significant in that it contributes to overall "mindshare". Now, you can accept or reject "mindshare" if you like, but it absolutely has an effect because people believe it is important.

    Furthermore, I have issues with the comments about marketshare increase alone as a primary contributor to getting Macs back into schools. The reason I have a problem with that is that school boards and school superintendants are typically in the back pocket of the IT staffs of the district, and so many of those staffs out there are all MS-heads. Until you can replace those folks (not convert, not convince, but replace) you're hardly likely to see much penetration into the educational market.

    And with both businesses and schools, it's incredibly ironic that they cling -- positively cling -- to Microsoft and all things Microsoft and only things Microsoft, even despite the tide of spyware, malware, viruses and incessant security hole exploitation. I mean, they'll bitch and moan about all the holes they had to patch and all the viruses they had to contend with and all the maintenance issues which fill up their day, but mention "Macintosh" just once and they'll immediately jump on the bandwagon of "Anything not made by Microsoft sucks. Oh, and Macs doubly suck, and nobody uses them, and there isn't any software for them, and they just crash all the time." Yadda yadda yadda. Geez, if I had a nickle for everytime I heard that crap come out of the mouth of an allegedly-savvy IT guy...

    Anyhow, one factor of significant import is Linux's market share, which is now either equal to or slightly in excess of Apple's. It's a good thing, on the one hand, because it means that competition is alive and well in the OS marketplace. But it also should serve as a wake-up call to Apple. They should know full-well what this means, since they're (at least to a degree) in bed with the Open Source crowd.



    more...


    zach galifianakis gq magazine. Trust Zach Galifianakis to
  • Trust Zach Galifianakis to



  • citi
    Apr 28, 04:16 PM
    It's not, actually. Every time a change in the phone comes out, the manufacturer has to make new cases to reach those new customers, necessitating new tools/molds/whatever (so more cost on their end). Any manufacturer would prefer that the same case worked for all iPhone4s because then they would only have to spend the manufacturing dollars once to reach a every iPhone4 customer. Plus, less confusion when people are buying cases.

    So what you are telling me is: An iPhone 4 comes out and I buy a case. Incase makes $20. An iPhone 5 comes out the same size and I don't buy a case because I have an old one and Incase makes $0. How is that better for Incase exactly?

    Manufacturing processes are the same for phone cases , candy bars, or screen prints on T-Shirts. The expense comes from the design and fabrication of the molds, not the manufacturing process. These original molds are already made so they can continue to make the old case at next to nothing. Once the new mold is made (the expensive part) it 's the same song.





    zach galifianakis gq magazine. God bless Zach Galifianakis
  • God bless Zach Galifianakis



  • cmaier
    Apr 11, 10:56 PM
    +1 for TB "Target disk mode"! I am happy they kept FW800 on the newest MBPs though.

    Anyone think TB will be eventually used for connecting things like cameras as well?

    Canon will use it for DV.



    more...


    zach galifianakis gq magazine. You Zach Galifianakis,
  • You Zach Galifianakis,



  • Hastings101
    Mar 31, 10:33 AM
    Like the guy above, I want the ability to change the color of windows or something. The grey os x theme is really boring.





    zach galifianakis gq magazine. Zach Galifianakis for GQ
  • Zach Galifianakis for GQ



  • Lesser Evets
    May 4, 06:47 AM
    I wonder if the iPhone and iPod will all release together in Aug-Oct every year. Makes sense since the iPod Touch, the major iPod, is just a castrated iPhone, so to speak.



    more...


    zach galifianakis gq magazine. More on GQ.com
  • More on GQ.com



  • maclaptop
    May 5, 10:03 AM
    You have to realize one thing. Without market share, company like Apple can not make profit.

    To wit:

    Market share has no correlation with profit.





    zach galifianakis gq magazine. with Zach Galifianakis and
  • with Zach Galifianakis and



  • Yamcha
    Apr 13, 01:54 PM
    I don't mind as long as the pricing is competitive, if its over-priced no way I'll be getting one..





    zach galifianakis gq magazine. Galifianakis photos,
  • Galifianakis photos,



  • GorgonPhone
    Apr 14, 11:12 AM
    white iphone is ugly late and unnecessary so apple can keep it.. they never made it cause demand was always lower for white ones and the white design look worse on iphone 4 than on 3gs..





    notjustjay
    Apr 26, 12:54 PM
    I am pretty sure you won't be storing 2TB of your music with Apple for $20/yr.


    Theoretically, if all that 2 TB's of music was purchased from iTunes, then the files all already exist in the iTunes servers and it would cost them no additional storage space to stream them back to you. So it may well be possible.

    I guess we'll just have to wait and see what the official announcements are. I reserve any judgment until then.





    Full of Win
    Mar 31, 10:51 AM
    UGLY. I hope tey have an option to return it to the unified look of the rest of the OS. If not, I'm sure there will be a terminal hack to being some sense back to the UI.





    fyrefly
    Apr 19, 01:20 AM
    If the new AIR is using the same Sandy Bridge processor as the Samsung series 9, you'll be sorely disappointed with its graphics performance.

    http://www.laptopmag.com/review/laptops/samsung-series-9.aspx?page=3

    3DMark is less than half of the Air (2188 vs 4611)

    WOW ran at a miserable 14fps at 1366x768 res compared to the Air that runs at 53fps at 1440x900. Battery life is worse as well.

    We knew all this Graphics stuff already like a month ago from the Engadget review.

    They said the Series 9 gets 25 mins less battery life (http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/28/samsung-series-9-900x-laptop-review/).

    PCMag says the Series 9 gets almost an hour MORE battery life (http://www.pcmag.com/image_popup/0,1740,iid=291739,00.asp). These reviews are all over the place, and only tell part of the story.

    Yes, the graphics (aka Gaming) performance will be less. But it seems on par or better than the 9400m, which people use just fine every day in the 2008/2009 MBA/MB/MBP's.

    And regarding Battery life - we have no idea what Voodoo Apple puts into the power optimization of it's laptops.

    All we can empirically say at this point is that the (U)LV i5/i7 chips with IGP consume about 21W TDP, which is less than the SL9400/9600+320m combo which some have pegged at over 30W TDP. The laws of physics seem to dictate that since it draws up to 10W less power and would (presumably) have the same battery, a SB MBA would have more battery life than a C2D MBA.





    lordonuthin
    Oct 17, 01:15 AM
    let us know how it goes

    I've started with <./fah6 -bigadv -smp 16 -local> after getting rid of the unit it was working on, it is finally using all 16 cores now, had only been using 8. It doesn't look like it's doing anything more strenuous.

    [05:54:53] pleted 2500 out of 250000 steps (1%)
    [05:57:58] Completed 5000 out of 250000 steps (2%)
    [06:01:02] Completed 7500 out of 250000 steps (3%)
    [06:04:07] Completed 10000 out of 250000 steps (4%)
    [06:07:13] Completed 12500 out of 250000 steps (5%)
    [06:10:20] Completed 15000 out of 250000 steps (6%)





    slackersonly
    Nov 3, 11:04 AM
    Oooh that looks better than Parallels. I like the connectivity stuff above too. :)

    It will be interesting to see changes the parallels will make. competition is nice. unless you are microsoft...